53, pp 1024–1037.

– Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A., Scheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adult’s orientations toward control versus autonomy in children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, pp 642–650.

– De graf, N.D, De graf. M, and Kraaykamp,G (2002). Widening Participation: A Rough Guide for higher education Providers, Journal of Youth and Adolescence , pp 101-113.

– Delanty , Gerard (2001 ). Challenging Knowledge; The University in the Knowledge Society. The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

– Dewey, J. (1971). Experience and Nature. La Salle. Illinois: Open Court.

– Diderot, D. (1971). Plan dune universite, Oeuures completes. Paris Club Francaise du Livre.

– DiMaggio, Paul. 1982. “Cultural Capital and Social Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of High School Students.” American Sociological Review 47, Pp189-201.

– DiMaggio, Paul, and John Mohr. 1985. “Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection.” American Journal of Sociology 90, Pp1231-61.

– Donald, Hill (1993). Islamic Science and Engineering, Edinburgh univ, press, p 4.

– Durkheim, E. (1977). The. The Evolution of Educational Thought. London: Routledge.

– Ferla, J. & Valke, M. & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic Self-efficacy and Academic Selfconcept: Reconsidering Structural Relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, pp: 499-505.

– Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, pp 257–274.

– Giddens, A (1998). The Third Way-Camvridge: Polity Press.

– Habermas, J. (1962). The idea of the University – learning processes, in The New Canseruatism: Caltural Criticism and the Historians Debate. Cambidge: polity press.

– Habermas, J. (1971). The university in a democracy: democratization of the un- niversity, in Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann.

– Halsey, A. H. et al (1997). 3ducation, culture, economy, society. Oxford, London: Oxford Unversity Press, p 9.

– Haller, E. J., & Virkler, S. J. (1993). Another look at rural–nonrural differences in students’ educational aspirations. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9, pp 170–178.

– Hartog, J (2000). Human capital as an instrument of analysis for the economics of education, Euro- pean Journal of Education, Vol. 35 (1): pp 7-32.

– Harbison, F.H (1973). Human, culture, economy, society. Oxford, London: Oxford University Press. P3.

– Harker,R. ,(1990). “Education and Cultural Capital” in Harker, R., Mahar, C. ,&Wilkes, C. , (eds), An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu: The Practice of Theory, Macmilan Press, London, P: 13.

– Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, pp 151–179.

– Hill, Peter. W. (1997). and crevoal, the role of standards ind Educational reform for the 21 centery 1997,p 38.

– Hoknbury, D. H., & Hoknbury, S. E. (2004). Discovering Psychology. Tehran:Worth Publisher Parastoo book.

– Hughes, D. and Lauder, H (1991). Human capital theory and the wastage of talent in New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 26 (10), pp 5-20.

– Humboldt, W. von (1970) university reform in Germany: reports and documents Minera, 8, pp: 242-50

– Jing, H. (2007). Analysis on the relationship among test anxiety, self-concept and academic competency. Jan, V. 5, no1, p: 48-51.

– Judith, Gordon .(1999). Organizational behavior (A diagnostic approach), prentice hall, p: 67.

– Kant, I. (1979) the Conflict: of the Faculties. New York: Abaris Books.

– Karabel, J. and Halsey, A. H (1977). Educational, research: A review and interpretation, in karabel, J. and Halsey. A.H (eds) Power and ideology in education, New York: Oxford University press, pp1-89.

– Kaziboni and tabeth, (2000). “picking up Threads-Women pursuing Further stu- dies at the University of zimvawe” studies in the Education of Adutsvo132.

– Kalmijn, Matthijs, and Gerbert Kraaykamp. 1996. “Race, Cultural Capital, and Schooling.” Sociology of Education 69, Pp22-34.

– Kerr, C. (1963) The Uses of the University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer- sity press.

– Kilminster, R (1998). The Soiological Revolution, London: Routledge.

– Lareau, Annette. 1 987. “Social Class Differences in Family-School Relationships: The Importance of Cultural Capital.” Sociology of Education 60: Pp73-85.

– Leff, G. (1965). Medieval Thought: St. Augustine to Ockham. Hammonds worth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.

– Leppel, K., Williams, M.L. and Waldauer, C. (2001) The impact of parental occupation and socioeco- nomic status on choice of college major, Journal of Family and Economic Issues, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 373-394.

– Lyotard, J.- F., G. Bennington and B. Massumi Translators (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

– Lyotard, J. F. (1979/1984) The Postmodern Condition: a Report On Knowledge, manchester: Manchester University press.

– Marsh, H. W. (2002). Causal Ordering of Academic, Self-Concept and Achievement. Self-Concept Research: Driving International Research Agendas. University of western Sydney Australia, pp: 1-10.

– Manstead, A.R., & Hewston, M., & Fisk, S. T., & Hogg, M. A., & Reies, H.T., and Semin,G.(1996) . The black well Encyclopedia of Social psychology. Black well publisher Ltd.

– Maras, P (2007). Aiming Higher: School Students’ Attitudes to Higher Education, The Australian Educational Researcher,Volume 34, Number 3. p 69.

– Marques J.P.C., J.M.G. Carac¸ H. Diz, How canuniversity–industry–government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?- the case of the University of Coimbra, Technovation, 26, pp. 534–542, 2009.

– Maxwell, G & Cooper, M & Biggs, N (2000). Social, Educational and Personal Influences on Aspiration, NCVER, Australian National Training Authority, pp 1-112.

– McGrew, A (1996). Global Society, in Hall, Held and Mc Grew Modernity and Its Future.

– Mendaglio, S. & Pyryt, M. C. (2002). Using focused assessment to understand and enhance gifted students’ self-concept. AGATE (Journal of the Gifted and Talented Education Council of the Alberta Teachers’ Association), 15 (1), 23-30.

– Mueller Pamela, Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth, Research Policy, 35, pp. 1499–1508, 2006.

– mumper, m (2003). The Future Of College Access: The Declining Role of public Higher Education in Promoting Equal Opportunity, Academy of Political and Social Science January 2003 vol. 585, no 1, pp 97-117.

-Myers, D. J. (1999). Social Psychology, Boston, Mc Graw- Hill College.

– Noland. M (2012). The Lottery Scholarships FAFSA Requirement and its impact on Pell Grants for Tennesseans, pp 1-17.

– Parsons, T. and platt, G.(1973) The Amerrican University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Unrversity press.

– Parsons, T. (1974) The university “bundle”: a study of the balance between differ- entiation and integration, in N. Smelser and G. Almond (eds) Public Higher Education in California: Growth, Structural Change, and Conflict. Berkeley: University press.

– Parsons, T. (1979) Action Theory and the Human Condition. New York: Free p

– Patricia L. Hardre and Johnmarshall Reeve (2003). Journal of Educational Psychology Copyright 2003 by the American Psychological Association, Inc, pp 347-356.

– Raschke, C. A. (2003) the digital revolution and the coming of the postmodern university. London and New York, Routledge falmer.

– Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic–extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16, pp 165–185.

– Readings, B. (1996) The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

– Ryan, R. & E.l. Deci (2000a). Self–determination Theory and the Facilit- ation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well–being. American Psychologist. Vol. 55(1), 68-78.

– Ryan, R. & E.l. Deci (2000b). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Classic Definition and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, pp: 54-67. (http://idealibrary.com).

– Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, pp 749–761.

– Ringer, F. (1969) The Decline of the German Mandarins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.

– Rothblatt, S. (1997) The modern University and its Discontents: The Fate of Nermans legacies in Britain and America. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

– Slaughter, S. And L. Leslie (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, And The Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

– Stockard. J. (1980). Sex inequities in the experience of students, Newyork, Academic press.

– Solomontos-Kountouri O, Hurry J.( 2008). Political, religious and ccupational identities in context: Placing identity status paradigm in context. J Adolesc, P: 78.

– Sorkin, D. (1983). Wilhelm von Humboldt: the theory and practice of self-formation (Bildung), 1791-1810, Journal of the History of Ideas, 44, pp: 55-73

– Taylor, P. (1997). ” Investigating Culture and Identity”، London: Collins، quoted in Communication Studies: The Essential Resource، Cultural، Communication and Context, PP:199-200.

– Tinajero, Gonzales

نکته مهم : در این سایت فقط تکه هایی از این پایان نامه به صورت رندم درج شده که ممکن است موقع انتقال از فایل ورد به داخل سایت عکس ها درج نشوند یا فرمول ها و نمودارها و جداول و ... به هم ریخته درج شوند ولی در سایت منبع شما می توانید فایل کامل را با فرمت ورد و منابع و پیوست ها دنلود نمایید

: سایت منبع  40y.ir

دسته بندی : پایان نامه ها

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید